A survey of Patients and staff satisfaction with a Rapid Response Psychiatric Liaison Service in an Acute Hospital: Are Elderly Patients Easier to please?
Abstract
Background and Objectives:
The provision and quality of mental health services in Acute General Hospitals is a growing concern. Developing research to elicit the views of patients and staff will offer insights into service improvements. The Rapid Assessment, Interface and Discharge service (RAID) developed in an Acute General Hospital to deliver a rapid-response, 24-hour, 7-day- a- week, age-inclusive intervention was evaluated for its impact on staff satisfaction, with emphasis on staff training; and patient satisfaction, with emphasis on the differences in satisfaction between working age (under 65 years) and older adults (over 65 years).
Population:
Staff working in acute hospital for patients with mental health needs, and patients presenting to acute hospitals, requiring clinical input for their mental health.
Method:
Data on patient satisfaction was collected through a structured telephone questionnaire including fixed and open-ended questions. Data related to staff satisfaction regarding the service provided was collected by a semi-structured interview administered face-to-face with staff from wards referring to the team. Training was evaluated using open-ended, Likert-scale and open-ended questionnaires.
Results:
Results show that the majority of working age patients rated the service as ‘good’ (42.2%), felt that the team was helpful in their care (84.8%), met their mental health needs (69.7%), and treated them with respect (96.1%). Overall, older adults rated the service as ‘excellent’ (58.3%), felt that the team was helpful in their care (85.7%), met their mental health needs (85.7%), treated them with respect (92.9%) and stated that they were seen in good time (100%). The difference in satisfaction levels between patients of working age and older patients was statistically significant.
Common aspects staff rated as most helpful were advice on managing patients (12.0%), support of staff (11.0%) and advice on medication (11.0%). The majority of staff surveyed felt that their practice would be improved following the training, and rated it as either excellent (61.6%) or good (36.3%).
Interpretation and Conclusion:
This study highlighted the benefits of providing support and training to staff working directly with patients with mental health needs. It is more challenging to measure the satisfactory effect of older people who continue to give favourable answers on satisfaction questionnaires.
References
References
Care Quality Commission. Dignity and nutrition inspection programme: National overview, 2011. http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/20111007_dignity_and_nutrition_inspection_report_final_update.pdf
Royal College of Psychiatrists. Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network Annual Report. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010. http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/PLAN%20Annual%20Report%20Cycle%201%202009-2010.pdf
Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health Liaison. Guidance for commissioners of liaison mental health services to acute hospitals. Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health Liaison, 2012. http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/PDF/JCPMH%20liaison%20(Feb%202012).PDF
Royal College of Psychiatrists and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine. Psychiatric services to accident and emergency departments (CR118) London, Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004.
Edlund MJ, Young AS, Kung FY, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Does satisfaction reflect the technical quality of mental health care? Health Services Res 2003; 38: 631–645.
Cleary M, Horsfall J, Hunt G. Consumer feedback on nursing care and discharge planning. J AdvNurs2003; 42: 269–277.
Maycock JA. Role of health professionals in patient education. Ann Rheum Dis1991; 50: 429-434.
Blenkiron P, Hammill CA. What determines patients’ satisfaction with their mental health care and quality of life? Postgraduate Med J 2003;79:337–340
Rosenheck R, Wilson NJ,Meterko M. Influence of consumer and hospital factors on consumer satisfaction with in consumer mental health treatment. PsychiatrServ1997; 48: 1553–1561.
Gharabawi G, Greenspan A,Rupnow M. Reduction in psychotic symptoms as a predictor of consumer satisfaction with antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: data from a randomised double-blind trial. BMC Psychiatry 2006; 6: 1–7.
Cohen G. Age and Health status in a patient satisfaction survey. SocSci Med 1996; 42:1085-1093.
Wilde B, Larsson G, Larsson M, Starrin B. The patient evaluates health care (in Swedish). FoU Report 45. The Care Federation, 1995.
Pope CR, Russell AA. Measuring patient satisfaction: a post-visit survey vs a general membership survey. HMO Pract 1997; 11: 74-79.
Elliott RL, Cohen MD,Evans DL. Reforming Georgia's mental health system. Community Ment Health J1995;31:413-423
Hansson L. Outcome assessment in psychiatric service evaluation. SocPsychiatry PsychiatrEpidemiol2001;36: 244–248
Björkman T, Hansson L, Svensson B, Berglund I. What is important in psychiatric outpatient care? Quality of care from the patient’s perspective. Int J Qual Health Care1996;7: 355–362
Priebe S, Gruyters T. Patients’ assessment of treatment predicting outcome. Schizophr Bull1995;21: 87–94
Ruggeri M. Patients’ and relatives’ satisfaction with psychiatric services: the state of art of its measurement. Soc Psychiatry PsychiatrEpidemiol1994; 29: 212–227
Hansson L, HöglundE .Patient satisfaction with psychiatric services. The development, reliability and validity of two patient satisfaction questionnaires for use in inpatient and outpatient settings. Nord J Psychiatry1995; 49: 257–262
Brunero S, Lamont S, Fairbrother G. Using and understanding consumer satisfaction to effect an improvement in mental health service delivery. J Psychiatr Mental Health Nurs 2009; 16: 272–278
Chang E, Hancock K, Chenoweth L, Jeon YH, Glasson J, Gradidge K, Graham E. The influence of demographic variables and ward type on elderly patients' perceptions of needs and satisfaction during acute hospitalization.Int J NursPract2003; 3:191-201.
Great Britain. Mental Health Act 1983: Elizabeth II. Chapter 20. 1983. London: The Stationary Office.
Summers M, Happell B. Patient satisfaction with psychiatric services provided by a Melbourne tertiary hospital emergency department. J PsychiatrMent Health Nurs2003; 10: 351-357.
South Staffs PCT.Patient and Public Experience and Engagement: Real Accountability. Demonstrating responsiveness and accountability. South Staffs PCT, 2011.http://www.southstaffordshirepct.nhs.uk/Aboutus/Docs/PCT-RealAccountability2011.pdf
Yin R. Case study research: Design and method (2nd edn.). Sage Publications, 1994.
Myers M. Qualitative Research and the Generalizability Question: Standing Firm with Proteus. The Qualitative Report, 2000; 4: 3-4.
Meg C Kong, Fabian T Camacho, Steven R Feldman, Roger T Anderson, and Rajesh Balkrishnan Correlates of patient satisfaction with physician visit: Differences between elderly and non-elderly survey respondents Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007; 5: 62.
The Copyright Notice entered below will appear in About the Journal and in each published item's metadata. While it is up to the journal to determine the nature of its copyright agreement with authors, the Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of the CREATIVE COMMONS license. To that end, it provides SAMPLE COPYRIGHT NOTICE WORDING that can be cut and pasted into the space below for journals that (a) offer open access, (b) offer delayed open access, or (c) do not offer open access.
